On statement of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Chief Mohan Bhagwat, once again a fierce debate on DNA has erupted. This can be gauged from the fact that #Brahmin_ka_DNA_foreign hash tag started trending on social media.
Read This: Death Or Murder Of Father Stan Swamy? Blame On BJP Govt
Former Managing Editor of India Today Hindi magazine, Dilip C Mandal, sharing a post with RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat on his Facebook post, has questioned, “Everyone’s DNA is the same, so why do RSS chiefs make only Brahmins. ?”
He wrote, “How can you speak without getting checked? Mohan Bhagwat get your DNA checked. BAMCEF has been demanding for so many years and you have been on the run. It is wrong. You say this is your fatherland. On others you doubt.”
Dilip Mandal further wrote, “Get your DNA tested. We doubt you. Tilak has also written that you people have come from the North Pole. Have written the whole book named Arctic Home in Vedas. Don’t be afraid to get tested. needed.”
Responding to the DNA statement of RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat, spiritual guru and Congress leader Acharya Pramod also wrote on his Twitter handle that, “According to Mohan ji Bhagwat, all are “Hindu” here, then love jihad. And what is the need of a law like “conversion”.
मोहन जी भागवत के अनुसार यहाँ सब “हिंदू”
हैं,फिर लव जिहाद और “धर्मान्तरण”
जैसे क़ानून की ज़रूरत क्या है.
— Acharya Pramod (@AcharyaPramodk) July 5, 2021
Let us inform that Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Chief Mohan Bhagwat, who was an advisor to former Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao, arrived in Ghaziabad on Sunday on the occasion of the release of Dr. Khwaja Iftikhar’s book ‘Ideological Coordination – A Practical Initiative’. In the program of the National Forum, it was said that the DNA of all Indians is the same, irrespective of the religion they belong to.
This statement of the RSS chief has come when the results of the district panchayat president election in UP have come and only a few months are left for the 2022 elections. In fact, DNA is often made an issue in elections. It has been used on many occasions before this.
